Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Animal testing has always been a controversial problem due to its ethical matters. Whilst some people argue that it is unacceptable to use animals in medical experiments, others believe this method is essential for the sake of human beings. From my point of view, I would say both arguments have their validity, but I would lean towards the latter.
On the one hand, as the concerns for animal rights are raising, there has been a wave of boycotts against animal experimentation for some reasons. Firstly, medical experiments on animals create harsh pain for them by the actions of injection, disease implantations, etc. Research has proved that animal pain is no different from human pain. Thus, it is cruel and diabolical to use live animals for experimental purposes. Another downside advocates adopt to reject this act is that there exist huge discrepancies between humans and animals regarding physiology, genetics and cell structures. This leads to the fact that the results of experiments on animals can be pointless and unapplicable for humans. In other words, treatments showing promise in animals may rarely work on humans.
Although I acknowledge the darks sides of animals testing, I am better convinced by its significant contributions to scientific advances. Studies on animals provide scientists with insights in many aspects, for example, how organisms function, how genes work, or how genetic diseases are passed by generations, which enriches the knowledge of human beings and creates innovations in the medical field. Moreover, for such a long time that this method has been used to test drugs before they are given to humans, thus reducing unexpected side effects as well as human demise. What is more, animal experimentation not only supports investigating treatments for human diseases but also saves the lives of other endangered species. For instance, many species that are at the edge of extinction are repopulated thanks to the method of gene cloning that could never be devised without animal testing.
In conclusion, under some circumstances, animal experimentation is considered unethical and meaningless; however, unless more effective methods are invented, animal testing will remain for the longevity of human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-24 | tnhoangthien | 89 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while others argue that it is wrong Di 89
- Some people believe the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and October 2010 82
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Do the advantages of solar energy outweigh its disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...al purposes. Another downside advocates adopt to reject this act is that there exist hug...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39943342776 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96717564744 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617563739377 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3967031409 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348840408811 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121147805393 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677524216271 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220816156027 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485752389684 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.