Some people believe the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental issues have always been a concern to us as humans, as they, directly and indirectly, affect our lives. Rising the expense of fuels for means of transportation is considered by some people to be the best method for tackling environmental problems. I, however, among those who disbelieve this is the best solution for such complicated matters.
Acknowledging that the increase in the cost of fuels can intimidate people into cutting down on using private vehicles, I reckon there are a few to no advantages of this method. Firstly, people have their daily needs of commuting such as for work, study or personal purposes, thus the frequency of their transportation would be the same no matter how high fuels cost. Secondly, under some circumstances, this method may encourage the use of public means of transportation, which reduces the number of private vehicles on the road. If this does happen, the environment is only partly beneficial from it since the causes of environmental problems are universal. They come from many factors among which exhausted fumes from vehicles are only the tip of an iceberg. There are more issues related to other types of pollution that should be taken into consideration.
One of the more feasible and effective solutions for these problems that should be concerned rather than the mentioned one, in my opinion, is minimising plastic garbage because of its excessive harm to the environment. In many nations nowadays, the treatments for this kind of trash are usually combustion or burial. Whilst the former creates toxic fumes leading to air pollution, the latter results in soil and water pollution when plastic breaks into microbes and cannot be naturally decomposed. What is more, a vast of plastic garbage is released into the sea and eaten by marine species, which severely damages them. Therefore, there should be regulations to reduce the manufacture and consumption of plastic products as well as recycle them. This can solve numerous environmental problems in relation to air, water and soil pollution, which is by far superior to the rise in the cost of fuels. Indeed, many countries have brought in laws for trash classification so that plastic trash can be treated and recycled. Moreover, many retail companies charge customers an extra fee for plastic bags to discourage them from neglectful plastic consumption.
In conclusion, although leveraging the expense of fuels for vehicles may bring merits, it is not the best answer for the question of how environmental matter can be solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-04 | vuhieuquy | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | tnhoangthien | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | tnhoangthien | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-14 | bhatt95 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while others argue that it is wrong Di 89
- Some people believe the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and October 2010 82
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Do the advantages of solar energy outweigh its disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, i reckon, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19370460048 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91171666019 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0285597763 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94444444444 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214063058238 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655954991788 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575483127151 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147736490191 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372512106354 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.