Some say that the internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together. To what extent do to you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another?
Some individuals say that internet is giving negative impact to the world by providing less physical interaction. I personally believe that internet on the other hand has made communication easier and faster than it used to be.
I agree because internet, the biggest invention of the century, provides distance communication both visually and efficiently. Since Internet offered less-physical communication, where people can communicate each other without physically engage, the mobility of people interact one another has broadly increased. As a result, people are able to access the world without any neccesay challenge. For instance, the major problem that occurs today, coronavirus pandemic, has badly paralyzed various aspect in lives such as education. Fortunately, hardwares as well as human creativity have solved this devastating situation by providing distance-learning through the internet. If there were no internet, I personally believe that there would be no solution for education procces in this horrible condition.
Furthermore, the internet has helped companies to overcome flexibility in workplace.
the innovation of the internet has devised various options through online applications that handle work meetings or communicate with customers effeciently. GoJek, Grab and Uber are just few examples of giant companiess that have earned million of dollars in indonesia by utilizing the internet. Morever, the income that earned by these companies has surpassed the average state revenue in indonesia over the last twenty years. The more choices the company have, the flexible they are.
To sum up, distance-learning in education and flexibility in a workplace have proved that internet has possitive impact to make comnunication easier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-27 | emjhie | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-27 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 67
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole Discuss this viewpoint and give your own opinion 78
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 79
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole Discuss this viewpoint and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... to overcome flexibility in workplace. the innovation of the internet has devised ...
^^^
Line 6, column 236, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...es of giant companiess that have earned million of dollars in indonesia by utilizing th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83011583012 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15320410749 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65250965251 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9518930486 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302021465908 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08792783168 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570587828239 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144825732414 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628001619587 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... to overcome flexibility in workplace. the innovation of the internet has devised ...
^^^
Line 6, column 236, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...es of giant companiess that have earned million of dollars in indonesia by utilizing th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83011583012 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15320410749 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65250965251 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9518930486 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302021465908 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08792783168 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570587828239 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144825732414 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628001619587 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.