The government is responsible for protecting a nation’s cultural identity. Some people think it is the government’s duty to ensure that new buildings are built in a traditional style. To what extent do you agree?
It is the responsibility of a government to protect a country’s cultural uniqueness. It is believed by many that all new bulidings are constructed in accordance to the native architectural style. I do not concur with this viewpoint because forcing someone to follow standardized old designs is neither justifiable in a democracy nor practical to suit the facilities necessay in mondern buildings.
To begin with, in a democracy, people should be free to choose the designs of their buildings since it is their democratic right. Compelling the citizenry to build buildings as per the government’s fixed standards will take away their right to freedom. For instance, if all the houses in a city were mandated to be painted white based on the regulation, people will have to give up their dreams to live in their favoutire colored homes. Furthermore, modern amenities, such as air-conditioning and multi-strory parking, may not be possible to be installed in a traditional design. Modern buildings, namely shoppings malls and office complexes, cannot function without proper heating and cooling or ample parking space. Since traditional architectural designs are not flexible, they cannot accommodate spaces for utalitarian services.
Lastly, due to land scarcity in major cities, high-rise buildings are the solution to the rising problem of residence. It is well-known fact that low-rise buildings and vertical construction are integral parts of ancient architecture, which is not feasible for towns. Moreover, conserving cultural expression of a place is possible by other means, ranging from celebrating festivals to creating public artwork. However, efforts should be made to restore and protect old buildings as they are a symbol of nation’s cultural identification. In my opinion, traditional style should be encouraged and not forced upon.
To conclude, although some people may support building new buildings in a traditional style to keep tradition alive, it will cause discomfort to people, pragmatic problems and infeasible for towns. In my opinion, owners should have the freedom to built infrastructure as per their preference. The government can encourgage builders to incorporate traditional design as much as possible.
- Analysts tell us that many people today feel stressed and think they have insufficient control over their lives What problems do such feelings cause for people What remedies could you suggest 84
- Nowadays a lot of offices employ open space designs instead of separate rooms for work Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Movies and computer games containing violence are popular Some people say they have a negative effect on society and should be censored Others say they are just harmless relaxation Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- World would be a better place if women own the leadership Do you agree or disagree with statement 79
- Some people think that punishment is essential in a child s education while others think rewards would be better Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cilities necessay in mondern buildings. To begin with, in a democracy, people sh...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 70, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional style" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ople may support building new buildings in a traditional style to keep tradition alive, it will cause ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58479532164 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23585805208 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602339181287 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5066152031 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.352941176 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248874454275 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777060141004 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701981883447 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153388995701 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508460024474 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cilities necessay in mondern buildings. To begin with, in a democracy, people sh...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 70, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional style" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ople may support building new buildings in a traditional style to keep tradition alive, it will cause ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58479532164 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23585805208 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602339181287 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5066152031 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.352941176 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248874454275 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777060141004 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701981883447 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153388995701 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508460024474 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.