In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Art is a very subjective field and each artist have different objectives with every piece they create. Some create art for pleasure other create for lucrative purposes. Art holds immense significance in people's lives as it a source of amusement and positivity. Art is not judged on the basis of its merits or demerits. Keeping this in mind, I do not agree with the statement a piece of art would be considered good if is understood by every one.
Art is not a field which rests on logics or concepts that one need to understand. The purpose of art is to evoke emotions, and emotions are not related to logics or explanations. There are numerous reasons that requires art to be ambiguous and unfathomable to most people.
First and foremost, art is subjective and thus every individual perceives it differently. For example, a painting might hold different values for two different individuals; one might find it pleasant because of its beautiful colors and other might find it invaluable because of its it reminds him of someone or some happening event of his life. Secondly, the more complex a piece of art is, the greater its significance and worth is. For instance, if a piece of art is simple and easily understood by everyone, then people find it trivial and boring and, they loose their interest in the piece of art and consequently, it becomes cheap and worthless.
Furthermore, some artist create art for their own pleasure and thus, other people are not required to understand it. One clear example is, Winston Churchill, the former prime minister of England, was a fond of drawing paintings and had drawn a lot of painting for personal pleasure. Later those paintings were bought by people at exorbitantly high prices despite the fact that he was not a great painter and most of his paintings are inspired by his mood and feelings at that moment.
Having said that, I do acknowledge there are a few scenarios where is might be useful for the artist to ensure that most people gets his art. To illustrate, most of the films are created for the purpose of doing business and generating huge profits. If such films are not understood by many audiences, it is quite possible that people might not find it entertaining enough and as a result, films might fail at their purpose of generating profit.
To sum up, work of art relies upon individual perceptions and not logic and concepts that one need to understand. Moreover, people find art more interesting if its complex rather than simple. Hence, its best if art stays incomprehensive to many.
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be s 58
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 58
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 70
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another 50
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 562, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...le find it trivial and boring and, they loose their interest in the piece of art and ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le might not find it entertaining enough and as a result, films might fail at the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83181818182 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7534763902 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497727272727 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0679844157 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.238095238 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302298748489 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940790251702 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513041726346 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160686989136 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402504578261 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 562, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...le find it trivial and boring and, they loose their interest in the piece of art and ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le might not find it entertaining enough and as a result, films might fail at the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83181818182 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7534763902 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497727272727 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0679844157 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.238095238 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302298748489 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940790251702 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513041726346 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160686989136 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402504578261 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.