Group or team activities can teach important skills for life than those activities which are played alone. Do you agree or disagree?
Several people have their own way to do activities. Doing activities together with a team or a group is able to deliver more crucial skills for daily life compared to things done solely. I personally agree with this statement and aim to deliver my idea in this later view.
Doing the activity alone usually extend level of focus than in a team. Once in a while, undertaking the job with a bunch of people can divert focus compared to one-hand. Furthermore, too much people create more and more noise and movements body while in psychology perspective it can disturb focus easily. To take my experience as an example, I have a lot of team-projects in the past in which I must collaborate and work together with others. Three are too many people in the team bothering my concentration, and I cannot finish my task properly due to noise. On the other hand, it is not a strong reason to deny that team work or group activity effectively deliver some essential skills.
Team work activity occasionally gives a lot of skillful experiences which is rare to face in alone activities. Communication skill is obtained in a work team instead of being alone. A public speaking experience in front of bunch people will improve courageous, and it is also paramount for negotiating in such crucial deal-deal situation in life such as job interview or higher-education enrolment process. For example, sometimes members in the team have different opinion for viewing a problem; therefore, some of them have to expert verbal skill to solve the problem and make a sensible decision. If there are no groups or teams, it will be difficult to negotiate.
To sum up, sometimes people doing something alone can strengthen focus, but it does not teach more substantial skills. Therefore, involving in a group is highly necessary to help generating such skills like communication skill.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-31 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and health illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people believe that the radio is more enjoyable and practical than TV What is your opinion 61
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In some countries more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this question 67
- A lot of people have become dependent on technology as it plays a big role in our daily lives Do you agree that living in computer age has more advantages than disadvantages 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities together with a team or a group is able to deliver more crucial skills for ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... compared to one-hand. Furthermore, too much people create more and more noise and m...
^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to generate' or 'generate'.
Suggestion: to generate; generate
... in a group is highly necessary to help generating such skills like communication skill. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92380952381 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91179822602 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0212572941 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311386569972 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101056539661 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840506273591 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18630696627 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135667016267 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities together with a team or a group is able to deliver more crucial skills for ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... compared to one-hand. Furthermore, too much people create more and more noise and m...
^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to generate' or 'generate'.
Suggestion: to generate; generate
... in a group is highly necessary to help generating such skills like communication skill. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92380952381 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91179822602 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0212572941 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311386569972 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101056539661 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840506273591 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18630696627 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135667016267 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.