You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the types of transport used by tourists who visited New Zealand from five countries in 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates four categories of transports that are used by visitors from five countries in New Zealand.
Overall, car accounted for the highest proportion of carriers, however, Japanese prefer airplane to other types of vehicles.
At the fleeting glance, 60% of British people and 45% to around 50% of German, Korean and Australian used car for travelling, whilst that percentage of Japanese was only a quarter. By contrast, the figure for Japanese who chose to go by plane made up 55% which was five times higher than that of Australian. Air transport used by the British, German and Korean were 35%, over 20% and 30%, respectively.
According to the graph, over half of Japanese population used coach for traveling in NewZealand which was similar to that of air. However, this figure only accounted for nearly 10% in Australia. The proportions of car users doubled in both Britain and Germany, whereas that of Korea was four times higher. As for ferry, Germany ranked the highest place with almost 50%, followed by Britain with approximately 45%. Meanwhile, the percentages of other nations only ranged from 10% to 15%.
- Space travel has been possible for sometime. Some people think that space tourism will probably be developed. What are the positive and negative about it?. 61
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 79
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 89
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch was similar to that of air. However, this figure only accounted for nearly 10...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06914893617 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69442590624 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7219791029 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113038191151 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497956913036 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597350082498 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880101945263 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749006850816 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.