In many societies in the world, the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare.
A nation’s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future.
Although the state face the reality that the number of people significant increased, the Government have responsibility to pay the public healthcare, so the planning family with two kids and child taxation would be the tremendous solution.
In the long time, the state was created by the founding fathers to make people wealthier. It means that the government had obligation to guarantee their citizen would be wealth and health. it could be happened, if the authority pays the healthcare for all citizen. According to the theory of welfare state written by Jeremy Bentham, the state must provide all basic needs for people such as house, clothes and health. For example, Scandinavian countries such as Norway, Sweden, and Finland, they health insurance for their citizen, therefore every Scandinavian could get treatment in hospital freely.
On the other hand, the situation could be a double-edged knife. Because, better healthcare facilities would give the increase the life expectancy for the elderly people. Putting more simply, the state would be stranded by the older people retiring and being unproductive workers. But, it could be resolved whether the government apply the program of family planning with two kids only. The limitation of having baby would significantly reduce the sum of people, and the government does not to pay a lot for their healthcare. The second solution is child taxation. If the government apply tax for parents who have a baby, they will think twice to have more than one baby. For example, China Government could reduce their number of people with the taxation program. Now, China becomes the second largest populous country after India.
In conclusion, even the total number of people is increased for this decade, the government still have a responsibility to pay the healthcare. It could be limited by the family planning with two kids program and the child taxation. Where possible, the government should impose the new regulation to restrict citizen to have more than two kids.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-02 | anhthuthcsht@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | anhthuthcsht@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | view | |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | 73 | view |
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favouring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this 82
- Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organization Do you think it is positive or negative development 73
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more healthy diets at home To what ext 82
- In many societies in the world the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare A nation s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eir citizen would be wealth and health. it could be happened, if the authority pay...
^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld give the increase the life expectancy for the elderly people. Putting more sim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22392638037 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70853337352 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5178705918 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6111111111 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125867572161 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445956918745 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463631992401 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778042819728 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236765960881 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.