The maps below show a plan of the city in 1950 and at the present
The maps below describe the differences of a city between 1950 and the present day.
In general, the most striking changes are the expansion of the number of citizens as well as economic, private, and public infrastructures in size and number. However, the location of the abovementioned remains unchanged.
In 1950, the living area for city dwellers on the north side had a population of 20000 people. The residential area contained the central business district where two thoroughfares running north-south and west-east intersected. One of them led to the airport placed in the southeast of the plan; the other went straight to the south along with the connection of the bridge. Before approaching the government building, there was a river flowing under the bridge separating 2 sides of the plan.
Nowadays, there has been a new appearance of a lake stretching from east to west of the city taking water sources in from the river in the west and releasing water at a dam built near the airport in the southeast. A new business district has been created after crossing the bridge. Another change has been a new and larger government building placed on the southern edge of the city. Moreover, another main road runs from the west has been built and cut across with two thoroughfares. This creates another way that leads to the airport which has been resized significantly southward. The residential area has expanded ten times than its former size in 1950 with a population of 200000 people.
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student s accommodation 61
- The diagrams below show how floods happen in a village and give two solutions to deal with them 78
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97211155378 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82990827048 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561752988048 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1572463387 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171186219221 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585078033697 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110598570103 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143485073554 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164270891106 0.0819641961636 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.