Today family members do not eat meals together. Is this a positive or negative trend.
It is a fact that people, nowadays, rarely spend time having meals with their families. This trend has introduced both positive and negative aspects because of the benefits and drawbacks which have been brought to human life.
To begin with, not eating meals with family will bring about an advantage for both each individual and their family. It is evident that people do not eat meals with family members so as to avoid conflicts between generations. It is hard to minimize the generation gap between the young and the old, especially during meal time. When the young people have meals with the old, they have to obey a variety of cultural manners that are hassle and disturbing. Thus, they have a tendency to eat food alone or with others like friends, who are in the same generation as them. In addition, each member of the family has their own portions. For example, adolescents prefer eating fast food to consuming vegetables while adults and elderly people prefer to eat healthy food such as rice, meat. Hence, instead of forcing them to eat food that they do not like, people are likely to have meals on their own.
However, with no family meals, people will lose valuable opportunities to strengthen their family relationships. During a meal, everyone in the family can share with one another news or stories and advice on solving particular problems. However, when there are no meals to be shared, the bonds between family member start to be weaken. Take a recent research at Columbia University as example. It is said that the frequency of Americans having family meals has steadily fallen over the past decade. As, a result, the communication and feelings in these families reduced remarkably.
In conclusion, this trend shows effects on both sides whether it is positive or negative. There is a plus point to not having meals with family regarding to avoid the generation conflicts. However, the downside would emerge consequently in terms of losing the opportunities to strengthen family relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 56 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- As housing is a basic necessity for people governments should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe government should be in charge of this while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...le do not eat meals with family members so as to avoid conflicts between generations. It...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
... family member start to be weaken. Take a recent research at Columbia University as example. It i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, regarding, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99703264095 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61061496894 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543026706231 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6610579123 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6315789474 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316040394759 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970511049429 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610782170739 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185536047725 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155634329226 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.