Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a chairity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children)
to what extent do you agree or disagree?
A notion that volunteering programs should be included in high-school curriculum is justifiable since it can make pupils learn about social empathy. It not only improves students' interpersonal empathy but also their leadership abilities.
Student’s ability to understand one another is essential and it can be built through charity programmes organised by educational institutions. If youngsters learn about social empathy, they are less likely to bully their classmates at school. This is to say, they are able to socialise with people from various social groups and have a better understanding of other people's problems. A study from the International Journal of Psychology in 2018 showed that there was a relationship between participation in social activities by students and bullying tendencies. This study also discovered that 87% of kids who participated in school community service had healthier relationships with their peers than those who did not. As a result, the incidence of bullying in schools decreased sharply.
What is more? The obligation to engage in the school's unpaid community service as a tertiary need might assist children to strengthen their leadership qualities, impacting more and more students who are qualified and have the potential to be leaders not only now but in the future. The reason why leadership skills can be improved is they learn how to plan effective meetings and handle several events. An example for this is Islamic boarding school where the pupils usually held social activities at a Bandung orphanage. They will be required to plan dates, coordinate a venue, and educate orphanage younger children. When they become graduates, they will be a strong leader in their environment.
To sum up, the fact that a charity event is integrated in the school curriculum has its advantages such as promoting the leadership skill and social empathy of the youngster. However, teachers and educational institutions must support and supervise the pupils in such activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-18 | fatimatuzzahro | 89 | view |
- Percentage participation of men in Senior development position 91
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a chairity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think is a positive or negative situation 61
- Cases of whooping cough Britain 1940 1990 87
- Governments around the world spend too much money on treating illnesses and diseases and not enough on health education and prevention Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, such as, as a result, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41719745223 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02264198317 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595541401274 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2301647087 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158811507424 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049831577867 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325099928339 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871977122358 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515441108661 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.