The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 – 2000.
Summaries the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how the birth rates of China and the USA varied in the period of 80 years. Overall, two nations experienced a similar pattern most of the times and the highest percentage recorded was seen in 1955.
Starting with China, in 1920, the percentage of birth rate in this country was 10% which is lower than its counterpart, after that the figure increases slightly to about 12% in 1925 before returning to the former proportion in 1930. Five years later, after reach its first peak with 15%, this rate witnessed a sharp fall to 5% in 1940 and remained stable to 1945. The highest figure was seen in 1950 with 20% and there is a significant decrease to about 2% in the final year.
Moving to the USA, around 12% was the percentage of birth rate in 1920. From 1925 to 1940, this figure fluctuated and hit the trough in 1945 with nearly 6% before peaking at over 14% five years later. In the remaining period, a rapid downward trend was seen in the proportion of birth rate in this country to around 6% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-23 | tranvuongphuongmy | 63 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 84
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47619047619 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30787318967 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4825755332 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132673501004 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724711105251 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073600479972 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102582392793 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259384857734 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.