The first graph below shows the wight in tonnes of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013 and also the amount in tonnes of fertiliser used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month in milimetres

Essay topics:

The first graph below shows the wight (in tonnes) of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013, and also the amount (in tonnes) of fertiliser used. The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month (in milimetres).

The graphs show the amount of fruit production and the use of fertiliser per month in 2013, influenced by the monthly rainfall in the same year.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were a considerable upward trend regarding the fruit harvest, while the use of fertiliser saw a fluctuating trend over the period in question. Another interesting point is that the number of fruit production in the initial year was the same as the end of the year.
Looking at the details, the fruit production started from 2,1 tonnes in January, then it rose steadily and hit a peak in August by 4,3 tonnes. Then the figure went up significantly , finishing at around 2,1 tonnes 2,1 tonnes in December, just like the beginning of the year. However, if we look at the use of fertiliser, the trend was fluctuated significantly. At first, the farmer used a small amount of it in January by 0,5 tonnes, it gradually increased until April by 0,9 tonnes, then dipped to zero in June and July. The number grew again and reached 0,7 tonnes in November and fell just over 0,4 tonnes in December.
On the other hand, the volume of rainfall witnessed the similar trend as the use of fertiliser. It began by 12 milimetres in January and jumped tu 16 milimetres in the following month. After that, the figure declined steadily until September by 4 milimetres. The number then shot up in the next three months.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-06 Hermione03 70 view
2022-01-25 hadiabdul13 61 view
2022-01-14 Nareia 71 view
2021-08-26 minhduchsgs 70 view
2021-05-22 Ly8 90 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. Then the figure went up significantly , finishing at around 2,1 tonnes 2,1 tonn...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, regarding, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67611336032 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63668673442 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546558704453 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6361051736 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267978737404 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903035044217 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103491012707 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184454023824 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130499443296 0.0819641961636 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.