Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home.
Is this a positive or negative development?
The rapid pace of the artificial intelligence evolution has seen progress in manufacturing and upgrading robots to remove human’s drudgery. Its work efficiency has also been proven by its excellence and productivity with a wide range of applications from household purposes to the workplaces. I would contend that this is a positive development for some reasons.
Firstly, machinery outperforms humans in many perspectives including working. For one thing, human’s organic body systems are usually hampered by physique and mental ability. Conversely, robots are more productive in undertaking tasks such as transporting and lifting heavy goods or repairing electricity systems, which is deemed a risky task. This proves that it is more flexible for businesses to apply technology compared to hiring workers for those things. Additionally, automation could improve the job outcome as the accuracy of the algorithm is able to counter all the issues such as wrong calculation due to the lack of concentration by humans or tracking information when assisting clients. Both of the aforementioned benefits are essential to businesses during their operation and adaptation to the needs of the market.
For another, in the context of home, these revolutionary inventions are also available in domestic use. For instance, culinary robots are designed to collect ingredients and follow the recipes to provide families with a well-prepared meal, which could save time for other tasks. Furthermore, there are also automatic house cleaners and dishwashers that have been ubiquitous these days and thanks to those devices, the living standard of people has been improved very much. The adults can spend time with their children in tandem with relieving themselves from the tiresome work whereas kids could concentrate fully on their studies without worrying about household chores.
To conclude, there are ample benefits when applying robotic technology to real life. This transition is changing people’s attitudes toward modernization as well as positively intervening in the function of mankind.
- Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write Why is this What measures can governments take to solve these problems 11
- Tomorrow is the most important thing in our life However some people think that the present time is more important How important is it for individuals and the country to think and do something for the future What is your own opinion 84
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...positive development for some reasons. Firstly, machinery outperforms humans in...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adaptation to the needs of the market. For another, in the context of home, the...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thout worrying about household chores. To conclude, there are ample benefits wh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64873417722 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04478896894 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648734177215 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5981325497 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113318448564 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362928747214 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422297610325 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698523628309 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259543349376 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.