Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important. Discuss both views.
In this modern world, perspectives of how to keep animals are varied between people. Some inhabitants think about caging them in zoos or forests while others think it is illogical to limit animals' movements. I am going to discuss these views according to environmental, personal, and economic opinions.
Keeping some animals in menageries will protect them from predators, bad weather, and food availability. Nevertheless, keeping animals free is more logical than isolating them because if we keep animals caged, they would not be able to have a fresh environment and chase other critters. Therefore, it is cruel to keep animals confined in tiny areas. It is advisable to put our efforts into keeping these creatures in their natural habitats, to permit them to experience a normal life.
On the positive side, caging animals is crucial because some critters are becoming extinct. Though jailing them is costly, the profits made by keeping these animals are significant. Take the Indian lion for instance; a wide range of people travel to India merely to see these lions in circuses, which will bring more money for this country. However, some inhabitants think that the governments should invest the money in improving the infrastructure of their nations instead. Building new electrical power stations, for example, is more important than spending millions of dollars to preserve certain creatures from extinction. Lastly, caging animals is the principle for study and research whereas others think we have no right to use animals for entertainment in laboratories.
To conclude, keeping critters in zoos might have many values but it is irrational to prevent these animals away from their habitats. The reasons are that besides they are not vulnerable creatures, they have the right to survive independently because of having feelings and emotions as humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | pr1nce | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | hokhople97 | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | kimtaeyeons | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | mido2070 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35254237288 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80709897471 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0111092412 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.266666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253143065928 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839713712247 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624966803548 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156523122648 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704040087356 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.