The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line chart illustrates how much waste was released by three companies from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that both A and B companies witnessed a significant decrease in their amount of waste while there is an upward trend for company C’s waste output in the same period.
In 2000, company A accounted for a large number of wastes with 12 tonnes, and the consumption experienced a slight decrease to about 11 tonnes by 2015. Subsequently, the waste output of company A continued to reduce but more steeply to 8 tonnes in 2015, which was the lowest point in the entire period surveyed.
Next, waste production of company B released to around 8 tonnes in 2000 but this increased gradually to 10 tonnes by 2005. Following this, there was a sharp drop in the amount of waste of company B, reducing to 3 tonnes in 2015.
In contrast, 4 tonnes of company C’s waste output were produced in 2000 and the consumption rose gradually to 6 tonnes over the next 5 years. The amount of waste output then increased significantly to 10 tonnes by 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think the government should not spend money on supporting artists and money should be spent on more important things To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y C’s waste output in the same period. In 2000, company A accounted for a large...
^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d. In 2000, company A accounted for a large number of wastes with 12 tonnes, and the consumpt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68449197861 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65613417535 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9211164627 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249361394768 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131730598229 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449623328006 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159930346126 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350653815575 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.