The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture describes the evolution of horses over a period of 40 million years.
In general, the transformation process of the horse can be divided into 3 main stages. Furthermore, the horse foot’s structure has gone through several modifications.
Regarding changes to the body, at the beginning period, Eohippus's appearance was simplistic with a hairless back and an undeveloped small body. After 10 million years, it evolved to Mesohippus with a longer face, back, limbs and tails. Another noticeable is that it had also developed its form of mane. These attributes developed continuously in the next 15 years when the animal was changed its name to Meryhippus. Finally, the appearance of the modern horse transformed slightly compared to Meryhippus where its body parts became more evolutionarily advanced. Specifically, both its mane and hind legs are bigger while the face, the back, and the tail become more sharped.
Considering changes around the foot structure, the Eohippus had small and short limbs forking into four smaller jointed toes at the end. These toes had been innovated and reduced to three in the middle of evolution stages, 15 million years ago. Moreover, it can be seen that the size of the tip of the biggest toe started to increase and protruded to the front. Lastly, the horse’s foot developed its form completely by replacing its toes with a single hoof.
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think that its advantages would outweigh its disadvantages 61
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, lastly, look, moreover, regarding, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11946902655 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80912124866 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2174566604 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137748344023 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519171123674 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600236605821 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111021604764 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731193612585 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.