the chart bellow shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015

Essay topics:

the chart bellow shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015

The bar chart illustrates the number of trash in 4 different types was collected by a recycling center between 2011 and 2015.

Overall, paper waste was the most collected type of reusable waste despite a slight fluctuation in 2013. Meanwhile, trash from the garden had the lowest amount among all. Additionally, the total amount of waste collection experienced similar trends through 5 years.

In 2011, waste from paper had the highest quantity with 57 tons. In contrast, recyclable trash from the garden had the lowest figure with just 32 tons. In addition, the amount of glass and tins was 48 tons and 35 tons respectively.

By 2013, there was an unstable trend. Glass became the most stored waste for recycling with the number of 48 tons. Meanwhile, paper hit the lowest point at 40 tons before reaching a peak with 70 tons of waste in 2015. Throughout 5 years, the figures of renewable waste of glass, tins, and gardens fluctuated with 52 tons, 39 tons and 35 tons respectively.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-20 hahoaan 84 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 67 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 78 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 61 view
2024-09-24 Sheikh Sajib view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ad the lowest figure with just 32 tons. In addition, the amount of glass and tins ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88165680473 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60990349106 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2912058611 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266566669687 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105693172283 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923070086669 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191692328059 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920386530256 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.