The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that
manufactures men’s clothing.
Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplier of high-quality
wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric
supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell very well: since we have not offered an alpaca overcoat for five years and since our major competitor no longer makes an alpaca overcoat, there will be pent-up customer demand. Also, since the price of most types of clothing has increased in each of the past five years, customers should be willing to pay significantly higher prices for alpaca overcoats than they did five years ago, and our company profits will increase.
The president of the company plots for resuming the production of the alpaca overcoat which was discontinued five years earlier due to supply chain problems from suppliers. Now he assumed the company will be benefited from the alpaca overcoat as customers would welcome the new wear again. The statement of the president is totally based on the assumption, and I find the chances of the president’s assumption might fall back.
The time interval is vital in any business. Market, demand, supply, customer interest, rate, and infatuation is uncertain. Five years ago, the demand for alpaca overcoats might be high which may be the reason for the high profit for the company. The same might not be the scenario now. Regarding this, fashion is always dynamic. Alpaca overcoat may not attract customers as it would be supposed to. The president mentioned that the competitor company no longer makes alpaca overcoats but there is a chance that local small manufacturers kept continuity in making coats.
The president has accounted for the price as a major accomplishment. Increasing clothing prices may not be inclined in the same proportion in the case of alpaca overcoats. The new fabric supplier might not collaborate to supply fabric at the same price as it was five years ago. If this would be the case, then the total production price would accelerate which would not result from the expected profit for the company.
Overall consideration for an increased profit of the company, re-starting production of alpaca overcoat might not run for a long time. The production needs to have more planning and vision. The president should consider several dynamic factors to have controlled production and calculated outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | Anish Sapkota | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | hannahHD | 74 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | hannahHD | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | hannahHD | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 78 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast food w 70
- To reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten movie rental stores Since we are famous for our special bargains raising our rental prices is not a viable way to improve profits Last month our store in 55
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplier of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 55.5748502994 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 279.0 441.139720559 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18637992832 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77666991435 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.041255072 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1176470588 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.94117647059 5.70786347227 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171248317408 0.218282227539 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554111613256 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570546123604 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112770536686 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359786985637 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 55.5748502994 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 279.0 441.139720559 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18637992832 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77666991435 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.041255072 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1176470588 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.94117647059 5.70786347227 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171248317408 0.218282227539 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554111613256 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570546123604 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112770536686 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359786985637 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.