Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
In the modern era, environmental problems are always in the spotlight and human activities are the root cause of these problems: however, we can take several actions to tackle the environmental crisis. This essay will discuss the environmental issues and the measures authorities and people can take to reduce the damage.
The biggest root cause of the natural crisis is overpopulation and human industrial development. As overpopulation has grown into an epidemic, the need for living space has gone hand in hand. As a result, we ought to clean forest to make room for urban and suburban developments, as well as to provide building materials. This action leads to deforestation, which has numerous adverse effects such as decreasing oxygen levels, increasing greenhouse gases and elevating the destruction of animal habitats. Additionally, as human industrialization increase in complexity, the progression from mechanical and biological have damaged the ecosystems by putting the emission of harmful substances into the air.
Governments should take steps to deal with natural problems. Firstly, the state budget should be allocated to spend money for scientists and organizations creating pollution-free power since fossil fuels, the most common source of energy is our largest source of toxic greenhouse gas emissions. Secondly, authorities are responsible for authorizing laws to address the environmental crisis by limiting the rate of air pollution from factories or forcing companies to use renewable energy.
However, to solve this serious problem, we need the cooperation of every single person. People should reduce the reliance on single-use plastics, which are taken mostly the energy from fossil fuels to produce. This can be done by various simple actions such as always bringing their own reusable bags or using their refillable bottles. Furthermore, individuals need to adjust their household behavior to conserve energy, for example turning off the lights when leaving a room or replacing the light bulbs with LED bulbs, only these small actions can save huge amounts of energy.
In conclusion, the world will continue to face natural problems unless governments and every individual take steps to reduce the effects of this crisis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-23 | huongnguyendieu | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-10 | congnguyen05x204 | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Sen Ho | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | jadenguyen | 56 | view |
- Question 2 Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in Glasgow in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Question 4 Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Question 4 Some people 89
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54335260116 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02040130063 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2842723284 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.866666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142781678377 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444661486716 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033888628679 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787708501601 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406612200001 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54335260116 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02040130063 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2842723284 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.866666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142781678377 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444661486716 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033888628679 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787708501601 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406612200001 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.