The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life
Given is the line graph illustrating the data on extinct animals and plants from 2000 to 2100 while the pie chart presents the figures for threats to plant life.
Overall, it is evident that the extinction rate has increased from 2000 to 2060 while the data on species extinction will have a tendency to reduce quickly between 2060 and 2100. Additionally, human impact is responsible for much more harm to plant life than natural events.
A more detailed look at the pie chart reveals that for people’s effect, plantations account for the least percentage, at 4.7% while agriculture has the highest proportion, at 18.7%. For natural events, the percentage of natural disasters is smaller than other natural events, at 7% and 11.2% correspondingly.
Moving onto the line chart, it can be clearly seen that between 2000 and 2020, the rate of species extinctions increased slightly from 5,000 million to 10,000 million while with the prediction from 2040 to 2060, the data on those species will grow rapidly, from 25.000 million to 50.000 million. Meanwhile, with the prediction from 2060 to 2100, the number of species extinctions will decrease steeply from 59,000 million to 30,000 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-25 | nguyễn nga | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | nguyễn nga | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 73
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13846153846 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64783290002 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7571966934 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.142857143 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179437086746 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952223757944 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894330018671 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136086384495 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103657253538 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.