Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A school of thought holds that undergraduate students should focus on advantageous subjects such as science and technology, while the alternative stance asserts that they should study the subject in which they are passionate. The purpose of this essay is to discuss both sides of this contentious argument and then explain why I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, proponents of studying subjects related to science and technology tend to point out a combination of reasons. First and foremost, science and technology have progressed significantly and impacted our daily life top to bottom, so we cannot deny the blessings. To illustrate, computers and the Internet have changed the world in every aspect, such as communication and cooperation. Another compelling reason is that students who learn these disciplines will have a more promising future. For instance, people who work in the IT industry may have a higher salary than writers.
On the other hand, I advocate those who believe that university students should study subjects they like. The primary reason is that students who choose their subjects as their interests will deliver remarkable results. One such example of this is that Taylor Swift, a world-famous music director, and singer, studied music as a major. Furthermore, the pupils will be less stressed and more fun when they learn their favorite field, and then they could focus their efforts to get their targets. Therefore, I think people are more likely to succeed if they follow their interests.
In conclusion, I believe that both sides are justifiable. However, on balance, although studying science and technology subjects is helpful for all university students in the future, they should be encouraged to learn whatever they like for achieving their goals in life.
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...uture. For instance, people who work in the IT industry may have a higher salary than ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.276816609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79329853978 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8118515665 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440699117564 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135077053444 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121365971098 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261902601691 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08706998825 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.