Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both view and state your opinion.
It is true that there are people believe that hosting an international sport event bring a lot of benefits. While some disagree that events are disadvantages for the host nation, I agree with those who think that hosting an international events are a waste of money.
On the one hand, There are advantages for the host country about international sports event. It is clear to see that big event usually attract a lot of people. Therefor, the economic of hosting country is promoted and have opportunities to develop. For example, thank to organize Sea Game at Viet Nam in 2003, that many people from other countries came to Viet Nam helped the tourism growth and they could be know about culture of Viet Nam. Moreover, hosting an international sport event help people love do exercise have a competition and could be new world record may be set.
On the other hand, there are disadvantages for country host international sport event. Because this events only focus on sport so only a few sectors make money from event like restaurants, hotels, store about sport... And the most people location do not make money from hosting international sport event. For instance, the Brazilian government spent money on building stadium for the 2014 World Cup, and now it enough money to deal with the covid-19. In addition, pollution environment could be increase by visitor, due to the amount a sports fan too much so the ability control garbage do not effective.
In conclusion, only a few benefit for country host an international sport event, whereas there are still many disadvantages for most population of hosting country.
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can government task to solve these problems 56
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can government task to solve these problems 56
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012
- The maps below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day
- The graph shows the amount of fossil fuel energy generated in Europe between 1981 and 2001 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
...who think that hosting an international events are a waste of money. On the one hand,...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...or the host country about international sports event. It is clear to see that big even...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...host international sport event. Because this events only focus on sport so only a fe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun benefit seems to be countable; consider using: 'few benefits'.
Suggestion: few benefits
...o not effective. In conclusion, only a few benefit for country host an international sport...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, so, still, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95588235294 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76320946674 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525735294118 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6686748598 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360848570565 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152187235071 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988611141866 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255163001782 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875446535774 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.