The graphs below show the unemployment rate of citizens in the US with a further classification displaying average salary per week in 2005.
Summarise the data by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The two given graphs give information about the average weekly earnings of different levels of degrees and the proportion of unemployment in the US in the year 2005.
In general, people with professional degree earned the most per week, while those with less than a high school diploma had the least salary. Another interesting point was this number was reversed when it came to unemployment rate.
Looking at the table, it was obvious that professioners earned the highest salary with 1800 dollars weekly. Ranked in the second place was people who had doctoral degree with just over 1700 dollars per week, whilst people who went to high school without studying at college could only earn 701 dollars a week. Bottom of the list was those who did not enrol in high school with just more than 500 dollars.
According to the bar chart, people who had less than a high school diploma headed the list with more than 8% of the unemployment rate. People with high school diploma was ranked second with nearly 6%, which was almost twice as many as those with Bachelor’s degree. Last but not least, in the last place were professioners and doctors with approxiamately 1.5% of the unemployment proportion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-02 | Đặng Luân | 70 | view |
| 2020-05-03 | katenokk84 | 72 | view |
- the two maps show a town before and after the construction of some facilities 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 89
- In some cities there are few controls over the design and construction of new houses and building offices so people build in whatever style they want Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this development 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an a high school diploma headed the list with more than 8% of the unemployment ra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, while, in general, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89705882353 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51746590119 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1509827052 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149026100336 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737428023006 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374804724998 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113450466978 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343433091406 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.