Some countries have free health services. However, some people claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health services. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of having free health services and their corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of unhealthy people is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that agreeing with receiving healthcare can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, free health services are received by people can provide societies with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantage of unpaid health services, are crucial. According to my own experiment, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the role of regular exercise. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of healthy services are visible.
Within the realm of science, the relationship between unhealthy lifestyles and free health services can provide communities with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of smoking people are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has described the role of sedentary lives. Thus, predicted outcomes of N are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sticking a balance between free health services and people who live unhealthy lives far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of unhealthy services prove the significance of the role of governments, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
- n a cashless society people use more credit cards instead of cash Cashless society seems to be a reality How realistic do you think it might be What are the benefits and problems of this phenomenon 88
- As part of education students should spend a period of time studying and living in a different country to learn language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Living in the countryside or having an urban life which one do you prefer Please use examples or your personal experience to support your opinion 96
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 88
- Students can obtain information of academic subject from online the printed books and articles and discussion with their teachers and their peers Which one is the most reliable source 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53815261044 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13946303137 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606425702811 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.238532446 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3889721782 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110342528587 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997848834333 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214000350874 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03742416016 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53815261044 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13946303137 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606425702811 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.238532446 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3889721782 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110342528587 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997848834333 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214000350874 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03742416016 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.