Imagine you are working on a group project with two coworkers, and the deadline (the time that the project should be submitted) is approaching. The project looks good but could be improved if you all work on it more; however, this would mean that you miss the deadline. One of your coworkers suggests submitting the project in its current condition to meet the deadline, while your other coworker thinks it is better to wait and submit the project after the deadline so that it is perfect.
Which approach is better in your opinion: meeting deadlines even if a project is not yet perfect or submitting a project after a deadline so that it is perfect? Why?
For this kind of situation, some people maintain that they should hand in the group project before the deadline even though the quality of such project is not perfect. Others argues that submitting the perfect assignment after the deadline is more favorable. For me, I prefer the second option. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, most students, including me, should place an emphasis on responsibility. I consider the quality of my assignments as a top priority because the perfection of a project reflect how much effort and time I spent on it. That is, if i informed my professor of inperfection in my project and requested him to give me more time working it, he would definitely considered me as a responsible person. For instance, if I am currently doing a programming project and I realize that there are several noticeable vulnerabilities needed to be fixed. Then, if I told my lecturer that my assignment, he would probably condone me, extend the deadline for me, and give me a chance to make up for it. Contrarily, if I submitted my code to meet the deadline, the professor might notice several bugs immediately and thought that I did not pay full attention to my project.
In addition, I am exceptionally concerned about my grade, but handing the group project late might seriously affect my grade. This is because most professors only take away a small number of credits after submitting one's homework late. Contrarily, lecturers usually give students a terrible grade if their assignment contains conspicuous flaws. For instance, I once took a course called Introduction to Machine Learning. My teammates and I trained a reinforcement learning model with only 50% of accuracy. Yet, improving the model's accuracy require us another week, so we requested our instructors the permission to hand in our project later for a week. The professor agreed, but he told us that 20% of the final credit will be taken away. Eventually, we handed in our work late, but we do successfully came up with a 92 percent accurate RL model, so we only lost a little credits.
In conclusion, I prefer to wait and submit a perfect assignment after the deadline due to the aforementioned reasons.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is difficult for a teacher to be both popular well liked and effective in helping students in learning 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
- If you were given a short period of time to learn something what would you choose 1 learn to play a new sport you never played 2 learn to cook food in a different way 3 learn to do some hand made work like clothes 70
- Some high school teachers teachers of students ages 14 18 spend most of class time lecturing speaking while the students listen and take notes Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ort and time I spent on it. That is, if i informed my professor of inperfection i...
^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
...re time working it, he would definitely considered me as a responsible person. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... because most professors only take away a small number of credits after submitting ones homework ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...mall number of credits after submitting ones homework late. Contrarily, lecturers us...
^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to model'
Suggestion: to model
... and I trained a reinforcement learning model with only 50% of accuracy. Yet, improvi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'models'' or 'model's'?
Suggestion: models'; model's
...nly 50% of accuracy. Yet, improving the models accuracy require us another week, so we...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98654220256 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4863058539 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2631578947 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191216277284 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564456047436 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475984632341 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116523738305 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472869129978 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ort and time I spent on it. That is, if i informed my professor of inperfection i...
^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
...re time working it, he would definitely considered me as a responsible person. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... because most professors only take away a small number of credits after submitting ones homework ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...mall number of credits after submitting ones homework late. Contrarily, lecturers us...
^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to model'
Suggestion: to model
... and I trained a reinforcement learning model with only 50% of accuracy. Yet, improvi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'models'' or 'model's'?
Suggestion: models'; model's
...nly 50% of accuracy. Yet, improving the models accuracy require us another week, so we...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98654220256 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4863058539 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2631578947 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191216277284 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564456047436 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475984632341 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116523738305 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472869129978 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.