In the future, all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
In these days and ages, the advancement of global technology allows various fields including transportation to maximize their potential, and automatically driving car is one of many products stemming from this progress. In addition to trivial disadvantages, driverless vehicles bring countrymen specific merits, so I strongly believe that the benefits of these cars overweigh their drawbacks for some reasons below.
On the one hand, driverless cars are ideal vehicles for disabled people to utilize when they are on board. This is because disabled people, such as the deaf and the blind, don’t have the ability to control any vehicles without the assistance of the others, either their family members or friends, which is the reason why they are more susceptible to overreliance on their loved ones whenever they want to go somewhere, leading to the nuance and inconvenience in their life. Therefore, the appearance of automatically driving cars solves their problems thoroughly as they are not required to drive the vehicle but the car’s automatic system. Besides, driverless automobiles are environmentally friendly vehicles. Specifically, since automatically driving cars run are powered by electricity with a very low amount of exhaust fume, in comparison with petrol ones, the pressure that driverless cars put on the environment is much lower than conventional cars. According to scientifically proven research, about 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere stem from transportation means, especially petrol car, so popularizing the driverless car usage contributes to a significant reduction of CO2, which improves the air quality and decline air-related diseases of humans, such as lung cancer and respiratory disorders.
On the other hand, from my personal view, the disadvantages stemming from hand-free driving cannot be overlooked, especially factors that degrade the reliability of this modern vehicle. Firstly, resembling a computer system, automatically driving cars are more susceptible to technical glitches that humans cannot handle on their journey than traditional cars. Indeed, although driverless cars are equipped with cutting-edge engines that can surmount extreme weather and geology, in some unpredictable circumstances, those state-of-the-art cars cannot bear making serious mistakes. This leads to crashes that are not only dangerous for traffic users but also destructive to road infrastructure. Furthermore, if hand-free driving cars become ubiquitous, people involved in trucking and delivering are prone to unemployment as there is no longer need for vehicle operation jobs in an automatic life.
In conclusion, despite having some disadvantages related to software errors and the unemployment rate of humans, driverless cars bring citizens huge benefits such as improving the environment and addressing the mobility issue of disabled people that are undeniable. Hence, from my perspective, the benefits of these cars still overweigh their drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2546.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78636363636 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20101675479 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577272727273 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 506.74238477 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2558039352 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.733333333 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192372458987 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717564427337 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397222834499 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121798659949 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136535184884 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.