Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take at least one course that teachers them the culture of other countries.
There are many different cultures out there, and some can be fascinating. However, I believe that university students shall not be required to take courses learning about cultures of other countries.
Although knowing about different cultures can be interesting, there are many more urgent issues for a university student to face. For example, poverty-stricken students might find moonlighting to financially support their families much more valuable than learning about foreign customs. College tuition and ever-rising living expenses can place much burden on people today, making seeking novelty or sating curiosity during a foreign culture class luxurious and out of practice. Also, many senior students are using internship opportunities to pave the way for their future career development. The reason is that after graduation, they will immediately face fierce competition among their peers to get the jobs they want. And when they are in an interview, previous internship experiences can offer them a much-needed edge over other candidates. Both activities help students in more pragmatic and profound ways than taking culture lessons, which brings no direct benefit to them.
Furthermore, students are already busy with their coursework, and they would not have the leisure to take culture classes. For example, they will need to complete assignments, attend tutorials and prepare for exams. Performing satisfactorily in these academic activities is the core requirement for them to graduate, and they can take up a large chunk of a student’s time. Today, we frequently see students suffer from health problems caused by deprived sleep. For them, taking culture courses would worsen their already tight time budget, placing higher risks on their health conditions. Even if they can squeeze out some time for themselves, they can better utilize this scarce free time for recreation. And with sufficient rest or entertainment, they can complete their academic tasks more efficiently and become physically and mentally healthier. Hence, spending time on culture courses is not an efficient or healthy choice for university students.
In conclusion, taking courses on foreign cultures is impractical and wastes their precious time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many countries are paying attention to environmental problems But the attention is not making the environmental situations better 81
- Some people think that if companies prohibit sending emails to staff on weekend or during other time out of office hours Staff s dissatisfactions with their companies will decrease Others think this will not reduce the overall dissatisfactions among staff 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television shows made in foreign countries are usually more interesting and popular than those made in our home countries 88
- Imagine that you want to improve your performance in order to get better grades marks at school or to get a promotion or higher pay at work You are considering the following ways Doing additional work or extra assignments beyond what is required Participa 70
- Some people prefer to go shopping in a big supermarket Some people prefer to go shopping in small stores near the community Which do you prefer Explain why 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There are many different cultures out there, and some can be fas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63126843658 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86778768283 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598820058997 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5174467664 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.055555556 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187779682864 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745251923954 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692454495618 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151665722925 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062046697399 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.