The diagram below shows the changes, which took place in a coastal area called Pentland
The two pictures compare the layouts of a coastal area in two years, namely 1950 and 2007. It is clear that there are noticeable changes in the layout of this area over the period shown. The main modification included the removal of industrial area as well as grassland, and the addition of many modern buildings.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that in 1950 there was. an industrial area in the top left corner of the map, on the left side of a road running from south to north. 57 years later, the industrial area was also removed to make way for a park as well as a swimming pool. In addition, the car park in the east was moved to the south of the swimming pool and rebuilt into a multi-storey car park.
The two maps also show that many apartments were constructed in the top right corner, and the grassland in southeast corner was removed, creating space for houses, shops, and two streets. Furthermore, this grassland was cleared to erect a new cinema in the bottom left corner. Finally, a small road was built with many shops along the road and A Yatch maria was also added on the sea in the north of the map
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | Vadesaer | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-11 | kamelelahe | 95 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | adamneyul | 74 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | ngoc1234p | 100 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | sonia 7022 | 73 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 56
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 56
- The charts below show the percentage of time spent by working adults on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
- The pie charts compare the percentages of water consumption in 5 sectors in Sydney in 1997 and 2007 73
- Some people said that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than positive effects To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: An
...ail, we can see that in 1950 there was. an industrial area in the top left corner ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3679245283 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36340996384 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3716973513 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898856832291 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413067945269 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361939234235 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691599356393 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494225885585 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.