The charts below show the percentage of time spent by working adults on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of time spent by working adults on various activities in a particular nation in two years, namely 1958 and 2008. Overall, there were noticeable changes in the percentage of time spent on sleeping and going with family and friends, traveling to work, working and relaxing at home, while a constant trend can be seen if we look at the figure for other reasons. It is also clear that the figure for sleeping was the highest among activities in 1958; however, that for relaxing at home was larger than for any other in 2008.
At the beginning of the period, a quarter of working adults' time was spent on sleeping, compared to 24% on going out with family and 20% on relaxing at home. Over the following 50 years, the proportion of time which was spent sleeping by working adults fell to 20%, and the figure for going with family and friends also declined to 24%. By contrast, this country saw the percentage of time working adults spent relaxing at home rise slightly, to 23%
In 1958, working and traveling to work accounted for 15?% and 10% of the total time of working adults, while the figure for other reasons was slightly lower, at only 6%. After 50 years, The proportion of time spent working rose considerably, reaching 19% in 2008. Furthermore, the figure for traveling to work also increased to 14%; however, that for others remained stable
- In modern age some people believe that it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In modern age some people believe that it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- In modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products for instance clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- The maps below show how a college looks at present and what it will look like after a proposed development 56
- The charts below describe the numbers of people per household in 1995 and 2005 of an European country 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...o years, namely 1958 and 2008. Overall. there were noticeable changes in the percenta...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... was spent on sleeping, compared to 24% on going out with family and 20% on relaxing at ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69795918367 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44879591148 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473469387755 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7154153524 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.875 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.625 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314267225561 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171177965032 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111812428764 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231349384469 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447544868907 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.