The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation
The line chart illustrates the amount of oil utilized in Iceland, Sweden, Italy, and Turkey over 46 years as a proportion of each nation's total energy consumption.
Overall, it is clear that Turkey's proportion of use oil surged from 1996 to 2006. Meanwhile, the figure for oil usage in Italy remained relatively consistent. But Sweden and Ireland's percentages plunged.
Looking at the graph, you can see that Turkey had the lowest percentage of oil used in 1996, at 60 percent, which was only two-thirds of the proportion Italy used. However, then rose dramatically 10 years later and hit a peak of 90 percent in 2006. Italy's percentage was consistently high maintaining, between 80 to 90 percent throughout the period. In contrast, a rapid decrease in oil usage was seen in Swede and Iceland during the first half of the period, roughly 40 percent. The percentage of oil in Sweden gradually drop, reaching 34 percent by 2006. The year 1986 to 1996 witnessed a small increase in Italy before felling considerably to around 20 percent in 2006, belonging to the lowest group share of oil use among the four nations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-06 | jadenguyen | 82 | view |
| 2022-06-06 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | minhpn | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 84 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- M t s ng i ngh r ng s c kh e t t l r t quan tr ng i v i m i ng i v v y d ch v y t kh ng n n c i u h nh b i c c c ng ty v l i nhu n u i m c a d ch v y t t nh n c v t tr i h n nh c i m kh ng 11
- Some people believe that the aging population is good for business the economy and society Other howeve disagree with this view Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly used. However, then rose dramatically 10 years later and hit a peak of 90 perc...
^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly before felling considerably to around 20 percent in 2006, belonging to the low...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92063492063 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74700515926 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7080529659 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257657219035 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991558219339 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384646539486 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171282519758 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124338372165 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.