Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is irrefutable that development of this globe greatly affects the flora and fauna.It is a opine that basic cause of all this is human activities such as testing of nuclear weapons, deforestation, pollution etcetera. A group of people believed that this destruction cannot be altered; however, appropriate steps and actions can flip this criteria, others thought. Here, we will take a look on both sides of arguments with my assertion.
To commence with the factors, why this phenomenon cannot be changed first and foremost reason is population explosion.To explain, demographics statistics of this world is burgeoning day by day. Consequently, to meet the needs of population cutting of trees is on its acme which leads to deforestation and global warming. As a result, plants and animals becomes its victim and highly affected by it. Despite this, establishment of industries and factories are at great place. Surprisingly, it is mandatory as well as in dire need to run smoothly this world and cannot be halted. Apart from this, pollution and nuclear weapons, their testing is perilous for our green friends and animals while from the perspective of safety and security of human beings it is imperative.
Even though, this scenario seems to be arduous to cater. Some positive incentives can be fruitful to dwindle its impact on them. At first, ilegitimate human activities such as mining, cutting of trees ought to be banned. Moreover, every human being must aware about their liabilities towards the plants and animals. Additionally, awareness programs by the higher authorities, seminars can be felicitated to guide the people about that precarious activities for flora and fauna so that it can be less affected by homosapiens.
To conclude I would reiterate my assertion that our natural world gets affected at great extent due to human deeds whereas it can be dwindled with the interference of higher authorities and self - awareness of people towards the environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-06-07 | sharma as | 78 | view |
2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
2020-09-04 | trannhi4566 | 73 | view |
2020-05-01 | tranminh | 84 | view |
2020-04-24 | thaovuphuong19 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...obe greatly affects the flora and fauna.It is a opine that basic cause of all this...
^^
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eatly affects the flora and fauna.It is a opine that basic cause of all this is h...
^
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eatly affects the flora and fauna.It is a opine that basic cause of all this is human a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... appropriate steps and actions can flip this criteria, others thought. Here, we will...
^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...foremost reason is population explosion.To explain, demographics statistics of th...
^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n.To explain, demographics statistics of this world is burgeoning day by day. Con...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24528301887 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96760747347 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1571382224 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342560518119 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107655718934 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614336088198 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193619326128 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600215777389 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.