Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The statement is considering that sound moral judgment and maintaining the respect of peers are two separate entities. I strongly believe that for a leader to maintain respect from his or her peers, he or she needs to make sure that his judgment is always moral, irrespective of the milieu in which he is acting.
One of the most influential leaders in human history, Mahatma Gandhi, who is still respected not only by the people of his country but by the entire world, never compromised with his moral judgment, which is one of the traits that made him so respectable among all the general masses. When times arose that challenged his morality, he took a strong stance. It was because of his ability to make sure that his judgments were never morally compromised that countries all around the world that were struggling for freedom considered him a role model. Had he compromised even once, he wouldn't have gotten the unquestionable respect he gets even today after decades of his death.
In fact, leaders who enjoy undoubted respect irrespective of their judgments have proven to cause some of the worst disasters in human history. Considering the example of one of the worst dictators of the 20th Century, Adolf Hitler, who enjoyed irrefutable respect from an entire country, eventually led to the deaths of millions and brought the development of the entire modern world to a halt because of the losses suffered due to the world war.
Some might argue that in today's modern world, global leaders have to cut some corners and have judgments that are not morally sound and will benefit their organization. So considering the trying times of the 21st century, leaders whose judgment is not morally sound might be a benefit to people working under him or her because as the organization grows, the peers might enjoy certain benefits which in turn lead them into respecting their leader more. But as we have witnessed the downfall of billion dollar companies in the past few decades because of questionable judgements, it can be inferred that for the long term, its definitely a disastrous way for a leader to run their organization.
Considering all the points mentioned above, it can be concluded that for a leader, having sound moral judgment as a characteristic is just as important as maintaining respect of his or her peers and having one without the other will lead to long term disastrous results for both, the leader and his peers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...model. Had he compromised even once, he wouldnt have gotten the unquestionable respect ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 622, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...can be inferred that for the long term, its definitely a disastrous way for a leade...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88915662651 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69625956616 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484337349398 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5909045949 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.083333333 118.986275619 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5833333333 23.4991977007 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.91666666667 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362919146591 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136959466948 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901190801542 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216795293865 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884487173925 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.