Some people prefer to go shopping in a big supermarket. Some people prefer to go shopping in small stores near the community.
Which do you prefer? Explain why.
The specialization of labor brought convenience to modern life by having the most productive people produce goods or services that they have a comparative advantage in doing. Thus, shopping has become a daily need for modern people. And I believe shopping in supermarkets is preferable to buying things in small stores.
First, supermarkets offer relatively more affordable prices. Nowadays, most people buy, instead of produce, almost everything they need, from food and clothing to medicine or home appliances. These items can cost a large sum of money from a long-term perspective. Consequently, many people would be sensitive about price differences. Empirical evidence suggests that supermarkets sell the same products at lower prices than corner stores. The reason for this is that supermarkets are selling large volumes of goods, meaning they would be able to have wholesale suppliers offering them goods at lower prices in the first place, making the goods they sell cheaper in return. Also, many supermarkets have freight departments systematically using large trucks to restock their empty shelves. On the other hand, most small shops can only hire individual trucks running by another company to meet their restocking needs, incurring additional expenditure. As a result, supermarkets can lower their expenses, which, in turn, reduces the price they charge to customers.
Second, shopping in a supermarket can be more efficient than in a smaller store. Although people make purchases almost every day, many would avoid shopping multiple times in a given day. Smaller shops are just not big enough to offer a large variety of goods - many of them only sell daily necessities, like food or drinks. But if people also need things such as bicycles or kitchenware, they might have to go to other specialty stores, causing too much time unnecessarily spent shopping. However, at supermarkets, people can find a wide range of goods available, allowing them to buy everything needed in just one trip. Moreover, since supermarkets have more merchandise on display, people can have the chance to compare similar products of different brands with relative ease. Doing this helps them make more economical or better-informed purchasing decisions and avoids the trouble of going to multiple small shops to make price or other comparisons.
To conclude, shopping in a supermarket is better than in small stores because the former is more economical and convenient.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends your same age 76
- Is job sharing good for workers Job sharing is a type of part time employment in which one position can be shared by two part time workers that is the two people share the work hours and pay of one job Job sharing opens more opportunities to people who ha 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Some people believe showing people happy images pictures in which great achievements are made in helping the poor is more effective in encouraging them to take action to solve poverty than showing them 84
- Which one of the following qualities do you think is the most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong They have similar interests and 87
- Imagine you have two friends who deal with problems in very different ways One of your friends believes that laughter and taking things lightly not too seriously is the best way to find a solution for most problems Your other friend believes that it is be 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, such as, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38242894057 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90607727003 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6323593371 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215945406591 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696605760468 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580023233863 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146812442515 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420530568723 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, such as, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38242894057 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90607727003 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6323593371 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215945406591 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696605760468 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580023233863 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146812442515 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420530568723 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.