Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that instead of prolonging the fight against climate change, learning to adapt to this global issue will be more effective for humanity. With this opinion, I think co-existence with tribulation is also effective, but it would be better if people stood up to overcome this problem.
On the one hand, finding ways to harmonize climate change is a logical thought at this point. First, it's probably due to lack of patience. It means that people have felt too depressed and tired in the process of thinking ways to resist the constant change of weather but that did not bring the desired effect. Second, rapid human adaptation is thought to be the next cause. The reason for it is that climate change is not entirely irritating to humans. For example, most people in my country can continue to function without feeling too much of a change.
On the other hand, it is certain that in the future living with climate change will no longer work and people must stand up and fight it. First of all, life on earth and humans will be threatened because climate change will cause many other catastrophic disasters that will shorten the life of the earth and affect human lives. For instance, more and more land, and trees are destroyed, and sea level rise suddenly engulfs the land. In addition, joining hands together to prevent climate change between countries helps to increase solidarity and education. Ultimately, finding ways to tackle this global problem will help people develop skills to deal with more devastating disasters later on. For example, the development of cooperation skills and survival skills.
In conclusion, I affirm that accepting climate change is a good idea but stopping it will be the best solution for the future.
- The table shows the information of total health expenditure per capita in five countries in 2019 64
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves company and society Discuss and give your opinion 73
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- In many countries major cities have become too big and overcrowded Why is it happening Give the solution to this problem 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91216216216 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48379517981 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564189189189 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4982981349 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213477929192 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708736129837 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552315834635 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12423832926 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383932776609 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.