An effective leader should try to make others feel that they are part of the decision-making process.
An effective leader should try to make others feel that they are part of the decision-making process.
Nowadays, people tend to have diffrent points of view on the question that how to make a decision. The most often heard contention about this topic is that as an effective leader, they should involve other in the decision-making process. However, I find this view overly generalized. In fact, this issue can be analyzed from two different perspectives.
Indisputably, there is no justification for us to ignore the fact that it is effective if others are part of the decision, especially when it comes to making some small decisions. It is widely believed that when asking people to help making the decision, it will make them feel needed. Thus, this will motivate people to work harder and be more effective if they are asked to involve in the decision- making process. I can think no better illustration than the example of myself. When I was in Sichuan University, the one of the most famous universities in China, I took a class called Art History, the teacher asked us to make a decision about what aspect we wanted to write about Matisse, a famous artist, instead of gave us certain assignment directly. In this way, when I appriciated his work, I found a link between his works and music. So I decided to work on this topic, and since I was part of the decision-making process, I was so passioned about this project. As a result, I tried my best to work on it, and in the end I got a very good grades in this class. Had I not been making the decision, I would not have had motivation to do this, and got a good grades. Therefore, recalling the example of my own, I can conclude that when making small decisions an effective leader should make others feel part of it.
However compelling the argument above is, it cannot support us to arrive at the verdict because it only focus on the small decisions; In order to make a dependable conclusion, we must consider other situations in which making a decision by oneself is more effective, when it refers to big decisions. It is universally accepted that if everyone ’s opinion is taken into consideration when making a big decision, it may lead to a bad conclusion. Thus, effective leaders should make the decision by themselves when involving some serious events, since it is good for the whole picture. My mom’s experience is the best example to prove my point of view. She is a manager of a cookie company, last year, their company wanted to publish a new taste of cookies, so she had a meeting about this project. However, lots of people disagree with this idea, because they think it not worth to take the risk if consumers do not like it. But my mom thought they should try to open another market, so she insisted to do it. This new cookies suddenly went viral, in the end the company won big sucess. It is my mom’s decision that enables the company to be famous. Thus, I am convinced that an effective leader should make own decision when it comes to significant situations.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, we can easily draw a conclusion that it is irrational to take it for granted that an effective leader should let others participating in the decision-making process. Therefore, only in a case-by-case way can we fully explore this issue’s complexity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-17 | shuya | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | P@rs@ | 95 | view |
| 2020-10-17 | baharddd | 76 | view |
| 2017-03-10 | Angelina2016 | 85 | view |
| 2015-01-02 | elhamtgh66 | 80 | view |
- You should always state your honest opinion even when you know that most other people disagree with your point of view 80
- Imagine that a professor wants students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of time Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone Why 90
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 80
- TPO 59 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to make' or 'make'.
Suggestion: to make; make
...elieved that when asking people to help making the decision, it will make them feel ne...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1048, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'grade'?
Suggestion: grade
...on it, and in the end I got a very good grades in this class. Had I not been making th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'focuses', 'focusses'?
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
...o arrive at the verdict because it only focus on the small decisions; In order to mak...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a case-by-case way" with adverb for "case-by-case"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ecision-making process. Therefore, only in a case-by-case way can we fully explore this issue’s compl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 87.0 43.0788530466 202% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2764.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 592.0 407.700716846 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66891891892 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93265142912 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77965615007 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459459459459 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 24.0 9.59856630824 250% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5662188722 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.37037037 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9259259259 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51307101947 0.236089414692 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160909855516 0.076458572812 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216796603212 0.0737576698707 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.439214037114 0.150856017488 291% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.285159816452 0.0645574589148 442% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.