is taking a lot of time making an important decision a good guality or a bad one
While many may argue that a timely and fast decision is inclined to result in better outcomes collectively, opponents might claim that analyzing every aspect of a decision for a long period is the more cautious and subsequently, the more successful path. I, however, agree with the former, and I believe that an effective decision must be on time as well as accurate to serve its purpose adequately. I will elaborate further as follows.
First, time is a valuable gem in the possession of everyone equally. However, people employ different approaches regarding the use of this precious resource. In my opinion, delays in making important decisions not only harm a person regarding the potential risk of losing their opportunities, but they can also cause the loss of an essential amenity; time. Additionally, I believe the waste of time is a greater loss than making the wrong decision, in many cases. There can be no wrong pathways, and even those that may seem faulty can provide numerous beneficial life lessons. For instance, my brother was offered a job as a remote translator while he was a student in college. He spent so much time thinking over the situation that the company drew back its offer. Thus, he lost a lot of time, and he missed the chance to perform a job that he might have liked. Even if the occupation proved not to be advantageous, it would be little to no harm to him.
Secondly, when an individual spends too much time meandering a decision, their mind becomes biased and the final result would not probably be different from their first estimation. The human brain has the quality of favoring its own estimates and noticing aspects of a situation that confirm the mind's initial speculation. Additionally, the mind ignores the facts that point to a contradiction to the already formed estimation of the brain. Thus, taking a lot of time to make a significant decision does not alter the final outcome in most cases. Referring to the example of my brother, although he was later aware of the benifits of the aforementioned job, such as taking part in international conferences, he continued to rationalize his own notions regarding the drawbacks of the position.
In conclusion, I believe the ability to make timely decisions should be appreciated in people since these individuals waste less time, a valuable resource, they seize opportunities, and also, the extra time spent on making a decision is not likely to change the terminal outcome.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 81 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 78 | view |
- when was it easier to identify what career leads to a successful career 83
- TPO 16 Integrated the archaeology science is in danger in Britain because of three reasons many artifacts were lost in construction projects many professionals feel that financial support for their research is inadequate it is difficult to have a career i 80
- TPO05do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment - doing things they like to do - rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- tpo 06life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- in many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
While many may argue that a timely and fast decision i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in many cases, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9520383693 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88919764585 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551558752998 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3006619709 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.722222222 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0555555556 5.45110844103 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245019468875 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687331890203 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783140243127 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156300728217 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261621827129 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
While many may argue that a timely and fast decision i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in many cases, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9520383693 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88919764585 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551558752998 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3006619709 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.722222222 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0555555556 5.45110844103 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245019468875 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687331890203 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783140243127 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156300728217 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261621827129 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.