Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the advancement of social medium and network, communicating via e-mail has become a trend in many big names. Some co-workers however find it more efficient to meet in person rather than by e-mail. From my point of perspective, I firmly support the viewpoint that people will produce better work for the project when communicating in person, which I will explore in detail in the subsequent paragraph.
First and foremost, not everything can be encapsulated in e-mail. In other words, meeting in person brings something special. For example, some people tend to use some body languages to express their feelings and emotions, which cannot be converted into e-mail. My best friends, Benny, usually talks to his classmates with diverse gestures and actions. When he firmly stands with some points, he will applaud and clap his hands greatly. In comparison, when he objects to others' opinions, he may shout loudly and break everything into pieces. Clearly these kinds of intense emotions can hardly be depicted in e-mail. Communicating in person can spread information and personal feelings in a straight way.
Furthermore, communicating in person can solve the problems and troubles between colleages in a more efficient way. For instance, I have been cooperating with my classmates to solve a complicated maths project. If we communicate via e-mail, it is no wonder that we might get lost in the length proofs and weird theorems. In comparison, if we meet on a weekly basis in a classroom, we can spare some time to reproduce the proofs and make sure that each step is accessible to all the team members. Whenever any of us get confused about the certain detail, we can stop for a while and reconsider the content until all of us make it clear. From my own experience, it can be easily concluded that communicating in person facilitates trouble solving.
In a nutshell, although it is convenient to interact online via e-mail, some advantages of meeting in person won't be substitued easily. Not only will people express themselves more freely, but they also solve the common troubles immediately. Therefore, I firmly believe that co-workers should interact in person.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Amtrak 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
...l. For example, some people tend to use some body languages to express their feelings and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straight way" with adverb for "straight"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...pread information and personal feelings in a straight way. Furthermore, communicating in p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14005602241 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86879592081 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565826330532 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2411691066 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.85 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223615576339 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648623910259 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573813242682 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14285305133 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705522221148 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.