Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Since the advent of policies, and rules regarding free speech in many countries around the world, people have been enjoying a more civilized and open-minded lifestyle than ever before. It is thought by many individuals that students should not be disheartened to rate and comment on their teachers, while others think the opposite, citing that disrespect and a lack of discipline are a great hindrance to studying. From my standpoint, I am in of tune with the former stand, and in this essay, I will discuss further my verdict.
It is seemingly rational that this behavior of students is unacceptable and should be discouraged. Underpinning this is the fact that it is against the cultural belief of many nations. A quintessence of this is China, a country having a long-lasting culture. In Chinese belief, students never have a right to criticize their teachers because the young always constitute immature and less knowledgable compared to the teachers, who are obviously older and more experienced. Moreover, when students are fostered to judge their pedagogues, rebellious individuals, which is a very common group in a class, will also have a chance to disturb the lessons and also other people, who seriously want to study. Thus it superficially seems to be irrefutable that this phenomenon should be restricted.
Nevertheless, adherents to the first view also have many plausible reasons to fortify their opinion. One of those is the advancements in technologies. Thanks to the emergence of what is called the Internet, knowledge acquisition is easier for everyone of any age. Owing to that, the belief that the older always know more than those who are younger is no more relevant to this age. Additionally, if students are guided properly, this method of commenting can culminate in numerous unrivaled favorable effects. For example, Teachers who are new to their job can have a general view through students’ comments to improve their professional skills. Because of these above justifications, I am wholeheartedly on the side with the first stand.
To conclude, from my perspective, I am more compelled by the first point of view. In the future, I hope that this trend will be prevalent in more countries, especially those in Asia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- line graph
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves the company and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 701, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...er people, who seriously want to study. Thus it superficially seems to be irrefutabl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14207650273 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0515688786 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554644808743 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3929832264 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210584747076 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605438524771 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583751237112 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124113348283 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431391111152 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.