Technology cause this generation less creative.
Being creative is more of a person's choice, if someone has that potential, they will grow in that and no technology can impede the growth of someone who seeks achievement. From my perspective, technology is a wing for an artist. So, I disagree with the given statement that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
To begin with, the technology always helped this generation in every perspective; whether it's study, sports, or creativity. It helps children at different levels like children can take ideas from the internet. It is like a free service of which anyone can take advantage. Numerous online free platforms help children to learn and grow. Learning is not limited to study, it also includes the mind developing activities, enhancing students' arts, and many more. For instance, one of my friends was keen to learn the guitar, but as she lives away from town, distance becomes an obstruction for her to learn. In this situation, facilities of transport helped her a lot, in lesser time she reaches the guitar school, and in some situations where this is not possible, she takes online classes. So, this example lucidly states that technology is helping in many ways by saving time, by giving better chances to learn, and from all these advantages she can also focus on her studies parallelly.
To carry on further, If someone is considering technology as a more disturbing thing and as earlier had no such thing to waste time. Then I believe surely that time other things would have to disturb child, also if they maintain their creative trait, then surely today's child can also do. In fact, technology motivates children to do more good. Earlier no such motivation was there. For instance, earlier some children had made a unique painting, rarely did people see that and value that, as no one was much interested. However, today things are different, and we can relate to this. Today when someone does something, it gets viral and gets famous in a couple of hours, people give reviews about that and this really motivate children to do the same thing more and if they were lacking somewhere they can improve that in their next trial. Apart from all appreciation and motivation, technology also gives more advanced tools, which consume less time and help people work done early which was not possible earlier.
To put it in the nutshell, if someone is creative and has an interest in good in the same thing, they will use technology as a helping agent and achieve well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer totry new things and take risks Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- 20 years cars will be used or less 76
- fossil own by private company causes loss to scientist 73
- Torrey plant survival supported by article and opposes by professor in lecture 73
Comments
If you like card games I…
If you like card games I would recommend you spider solitaire 2 suit, the object of the game is to clear the card fields to win.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85813953488 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5328570947 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541860465116 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.367787787 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.45 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203065258084 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628387030848 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611735152077 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135441278855 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433634163664 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.