In marriages today, some argue that it is the responsibility of both spouses to earn a living for the family.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, in marriage life, some people think that it is important to be responsible to become the shareholder of finance in a family. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement due to following reasons.
To start with, if both husbands and wives do not share the responsibility of funding for a home, it might result in a huge impact on our bodies. To make this clear, becoming a breadwinner for a whole family certainly put a lot of pressure on one’s shoulder. For instance, 57% of divorce cases happened because of the strives between parents in New Zealand. Contributing to those quarrels are partly the tension of a workforce in companies while the remaining are the families. Additionally, working in a stressful environment with peer pressure or the manager sometimes leads to overloaded work which seriously affects one’s health. Therefore, it is likely to have a partner who can share financial problems to tackle them.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that having someone who can help us to relieve alleviates the financial burden of one’s home. To clarify this, both mothers and fathers go to work to make ends meet surely can reduce the strain on the economy. To illustrate, in 80% of accommodations in Asia countries, both parents have an adequate job to work financial issues out. This results in 54% of families in this region being mostly financially independent and working things out on their own. Besides, owning one own job oneself improves self-esteem as well as advancing in their career. Thus, dividing roles, in this case, can mitigate the economic concerns in a family.
In conclusion, after the aforementioned reasons, it is no doubt that both wives and husbands should subsidize the role in the expenditure of their own families.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European county between 1979 and 2004
- Many working people get little or no excercise either during tge workinf days or in their free time and have health problems as a result Why do many working people not to get enough excerise What can be done about this problem 56
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0101010101 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88075424603 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6149006363 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111139481061 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348934667679 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406523920425 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069149703396 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371069736096 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.