The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.
The graph illustrates the number of who used diffenrent communication services in the world over the period of 20 years from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, I could clearly be seen that the number of people who used all of communication services rose gradually, while the cellular phone service figures was the highest over the period shown.
Looking at the graph more closely, the number of people who used mobile broadband and fixed broadband shared the same percentage of 0 percent in the year 2002. From 1998 to 2002, the number of cellular phone service users experienced a drastic growth from 5 percent to 20 percent. In 2002, the number of people who used cellular phone service was higher than that of internet service, at 7 percent and 20 percent respectively.
The number of broadband users and fixed broadband users hovered at 5 percent in the year 2008. There was a twofold increase in terms of internet service users from 10 percent to 20 percent. The number of people who used cellular phone service recorded in 2008 reached the highes of 65 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | thaohung244 | view | |
| 2022-08-08 | thaohung244 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | adamneyul | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | muhammad Hamza | 68 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | Sonamchoden | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83516483516 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55281135056 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434065934066 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6257183829 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328621689862 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183468684682 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111667002432 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254813747294 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073925268239 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.