Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about his opinion

Essay topics:

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about his opinion?

The amount of attention to wild animals and birds always has been a controversial argument. Some people believe that it is too much and others are opposite of them. I agree with second group and in this essay describe the reasons.
To begin with, keep the wildlife is essential issue for all of human generation and we should do all the best to transfer all of the species without change to the next generations. In the other words, extinction of rare animals like Pandas is a danger problem which may be occurred in the case of inappropriate protection. Another reason belonging to attention to wildlife is that from authentic approach which dictate to us our responsibility to help other species to endure minimum repercussion because of human activities that endangers them. For instance, global warming and ice melting due to human need to more energy will lead to significant changes in the life of animals like Penguins and polar bears in the Poles.
On the other hand, some people think we have more important problems rather than life of animals and try to protect them. They say that priority of humans are more than animals and when we have a lot of hungry kids, it is not logical to assign resources to animals.
As conclusion, in my idea the attention and resources to protect of animals is not too much and I believe that we are responsible to keep them.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-13 MahdiiiBN250 67 view
2022-08-13 MahdiiiBN250 67 view
2022-08-13 MahdiiiBN250 56 view
Essays by user MahdiiiBN250 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d we should do all the best to transfer all of the species without change to the next gene...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, so, then, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7125 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.640677391 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4557688801 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227781920618 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097595693325 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847385224365 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171376849163 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927914493296 0.056905535591 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.