The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps depict the changes to a public park names Arnold Avenue from 1920 to this day. Overall, it has more entertainment facilities and green areas are cut down.
In 1920, there was a stage for musicians with two nearby seating areas in the west of the park. However, they are now replaced by an amphitheatre for concerts. Furthermore, there were two gardens of roses with two areas of seats next to them, but then they are flattened leaving one rose garden in the northern west. And there was also a fountain between the northern and southern entrances of the park. It is now the place of a rose garden with surrounding seating areas.
On the other hand, in the east of Arnold Avenue, a café and a play area for children are built in place of the rose garden and the pond for water plants respectively. Also, the glasshouse in the southern east was demolished to construct the water feature. The seats nearby are now the entrance to underground car park.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57803468208 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49708306558 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0612321518 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0804711182775 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392036423922 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496331276336 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628355075703 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275678396667 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.