Many people believed that good planning is the key factor to success in the life, while other believed that good factors like hard work or luck are important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people think that good goal is the key factor to gainings in society. However, other think that other factors like diligence and good luck. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of people have good planning is the key to success in the life. First, people’s planning for work are believed to equalize time work among success factors. This planning support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall-save time rate of lower-income factors but also to mitigate their work incompletely in a day and have no time for others things, which eventually promotes an agile and development society. Second, people have good planning would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and planning human capital is imperative to foster growth economic and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant would be far more significant than the minor once people just focus on lucky and hard work but don’t have clearly planning. First, people like hard work don’t have clearly planning would likely correspond with a tremendous health strain on themselves. Doing all job at the same time, people could become tired and don’t have good health for their jobs, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such a as the health care system and family love. Second, people don’t have good planning and take care about good luck in life will never become a successful people or ideal model they want to become, thereby this would become a great burdens for company and society and potentially wasting time that these people could have spent time for unworthy things and deviate from the goal. It, instead, would be a more key viable option if the resources were focused on supporting skilled and planning.
I were discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, have good planning is the key to success in the life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-19 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary school in 4 states of Australia in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Companies use major sporting events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent Universities should acquiesce formal rival numbers of manlike and womanly students in all subjects To what extent I agree 56
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of their lives Unfortunately not many achieve this balance What are the problems with this Suggest some solutions to solve the problems 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t to develop other important areas such a as the health care system and family lo...
^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
... on supporting skilled and planning. I were discussed both sides of the argument. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05263157895 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51171462798 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540935672515 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9408322597 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345675843355 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135079375897 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878146693252 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243203051063 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423522030159 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.