Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with highest marks, while others say they should accept people of all ages, even if they did not do well at school. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Opinions are divided whether only high-ranking students could have universities’ admission or higher education should be accessible to everyone even if they do not have good academic performance. Although prior idea could bring several benefits, I believe that everyone could attend universities despite age and mark
On the one hand, it might be necessary to choose individuals with impressive educational attainment to enter universities. First and foremost, knowledge at highschool is the fundamental for difficult theories learned at universities. For example, mathematics is essential to prove principles at chemistry or physics, thus, students who are not good at math could struggle to learn. Moreover, selecting high-potential individuals for higher education could lead to a superior learning environment than accepting mixed ability, resulting in better bachelors and quality personnel. Indeed, if there are fewer students, facilities and lecturers’ care could not be shared, bringing more study opportunities for learners.
On the other hand, I advocate that everybody could have universities’ admission regardless of their age or their academic outcomes. Firstly, age should not be a barrier to joining higher education since everybody is entitled to pursue their university dream. In fact, undergraduate degrees could be key for upward financial and social mobility, therefore, banning mid-aged or elderly to have universities’ admissions is not fair. Secondly, high-mark could reflect only the learning ability of students, which is not sufficient for higher education. To study at universities, numerous skills are essential such as interpersonal and team-working skill, thus, the involvement in other extracurricular activities that boost aforementioned should be highly appreciated as learning capacity
In conclusion, students with good academic performance could easily understand universities’ theorems and choosing them for universities only could bring excellent bachelors. However, I personally opine that higher education is for everybody in spite of age and marks since it could promote career and social status and other skills are needed to get into universities.
- Most people try to balance between work and other parts of lives Unfortunately not many achieve this delicate balance What are the main problems we are facing What are the ways to overcome them 84
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- An increasing number of people choose to live in big cities What problems will this bring about Should the government encourage people to live in small towns 90
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why this is the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore study opportunities for learners. On the other hand, I advocate that every...
^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: ESSENTIAL_ESSENTIALLY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'essentially'?
Suggestion: essentially
...dy at universities, numerous skills are essential such as interpersonal and team-working ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31250973098 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.1158882841 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146951108855 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622288553414 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448086848037 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10576340482 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411349166783 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.