country's government should balance costs for foreign tourists in order to suit their customers.
Some people argue that visitors abroad ought to spend money more than local residents on cultural and historical attractions. To a certain extent, I agree with this phenomenon. However, I believe that it has some bad effects.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that foreign tourists paying more than local citizens is absolutely reasonable. Firstly, the tour guide must use another language, which is not their mother tongue, to explain local cultural and historical attractions. It requires them to have knowledge of other languages. For example, if someone wants to become an English guide tour, they will spend at least two years studying English which is so long and expensive. Secondly, visitors overseas should pay more because of taxes and the cost of conservation and renovations. In addition, taxes will ensure that attractions are always clean and also help that country develop more and more.
On the other hand, visitors abroad should spend money more than local visitors which will cause some bad trouble. It is hard to approach people which do not have much money. Besides, people who want to travel to all of the attractions will waste a lot of money. For instance, in Viet Nam, some people are into travel from the north side to the south side. In short, this phenomenon has both advantages and disadvantages.
In conclusion, foreign tourists spend more budget than local tourists which is also reasonable. But in my opinion, the country's government should balance costs for foreign tourists in order to suit their customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-30 | Vannguyenhd | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
.... Besides, people who want to travel to all of the attractions will waste a lot of money. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59381454515 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572549019608 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9081299984 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1875 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226342926391 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777017969445 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176106843126 0.0667982634062 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181863147707 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.230939351898 0.056905535591 406% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.