The maps below show the organization of a bookstore in 2000 and now.
The given maps show the developments which have taken place in one certain building from 2000 until now.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that there have been changes in the arrangement of fiction and non-fiction areas as well as the area in the middle of the store.
Specifically, according to the provided diagrams, the entrance is still there, and the position of the traveling area and new-book area which are opposite to the entrance stay unchanged. Moreover, the place for service in the southwest corner of the bookstore remains intact.
However, there are some noticeable changes in other areas. It can be seen that the area for non-fiction in the south has been removed and replaced with the cafe. The fiction area in the northeast corner disappears to make room for that area of non-fiction. Furthermore, another area for fiction to the north of the cafe has been narrowed in size and has turned into the combined position for art, hobbies, cookery, and fiction. The original area for those in 2000 has been changed into the equivalent areas for tables.
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for a country while some think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- Some people say that it is impossible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below compare two floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 100
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for a country while some think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61840715548 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7510739162 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0780724556951 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409725484548 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077969656478 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755506379514 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101692776429 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.