At the present time, the population of some countries include a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the one of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages ?
In recent years, the proportion of youthful citizens in some nations is more likely to dominate than that of older people. It is contrary to the phenomenon of an ageing population that is often considered as a serious problem to the national economy. However, everything has its two sides. Therefore, this essay will discuss the pros and cons of the topic in order to identify which side of it can prevail over the other.
On the one hand, the young adults are believed to have the edge over the elderly when considering economic benefits. Firstly, the large quantity of younger people can contribute more talents to the labour force supply, which can be seen as a positive signal for HR departments in various industries. Specifically, these potential employees can blow a new wind to the innovation and development of companies due to the fact that they were born and brought up to be creative. Therefore, people who belong to these young generations can possess state-of-the-art knowledge and skills which are encouraged to be applied in national development, especially in the economic area. Secondly, the decrease in proportion that represents the quantity of older people in a country can reduce government spending for pension and other social welfare programs. Specifically, when people are at the age of retirement, they are no longer taxpayers and at the same time are financially supported and facilitated by the government. Additionally, aged people are more susceptible to illness which can put the health-care services under pressure. Thus, the increase in tender adults appears to be beneficial to the national economy.
On the other hand, there are a number of drawbacks that can arise when the number of adolescents is much larger compared to older communities. Firstly, the labour market tends to become more fiercely competitive when there are numerous youthful talents applying for positions that offer high salaries. Thus a heavy burden seems to be put on the young labour force and force them to work exhaustedly, which can negatively affect their physical and mental health. Secondly, although these tender generations can absorb new things at a fast pace, most of them are believed to lack practical experiences which just age employees can have in high-level positions of a company. As a result, it is hard for hirers to find rich-experienced people in such human capital that are mostly newbies.
To sum up, I personally think that the benefits of the larger proportion of budding adults compared to age people can outweigh the hindrances from this because the competitiveness in the labour market can boost their effort, productivity and performance. Besides, recently, youngsters are also proactively in attending extracurricular activities as well as internship programs to enrich their practical experiences. Therefore, its drawbacks seem to be solved more easily than creating its benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-06 | hminh50058 | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opment of companies due to the fact that they were born and brought up to be crea...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...for positions that offer high salaries. Thus a heavy burden seems to be put on the y...
^^^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al experiences. Therefore, its drawbacks seem to be solved more easily than creat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2465.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26709401709 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01374099414 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7812463211 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147873161326 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433356522046 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389422498729 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085313156152 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259528326534 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opment of companies due to the fact that they were born and brought up to be crea...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...for positions that offer high salaries. Thus a heavy burden seems to be put on the y...
^^^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al experiences. Therefore, its drawbacks seem to be solved more easily than creat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2465.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26709401709 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01374099414 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7812463211 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147873161326 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433356522046 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389422498729 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085313156152 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259528326534 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.