There is usually a long que of people waiting to buy a technological product instantly, before a product gets released. Personally, I believe that it is better to wait a while after a prodcut is released, and then decide to wether buy it or not. I think this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, you can use other individual's experience if you wait. There is no users' comment at first When a technological product like mobile phone becomes available. However, after a few weeks, you can read other people's comments regarding the product and then, make rational decision based on these comments. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Six years ago, A friend of mine and I decided to buy labtops for university assignments. My friend bought a freshly-released notebook without researching about it so much. On the other hand, I choosed to buy another labtop which was available for several months. I still have the labtop, because I studied lots of comments about it to finally persuade my self of buying it. My friend, however, found his notebook broken 2 month after he bought it. It had crashed, because of a small amount of water had been poured on it accidentually.
Secondly, it is probable that after a while better products become available by oponent companies. The Technological device market is highly competitive, and it is likely that a company will produce a similar product that outperforms the currently available one after a few weeks or so. For instance, last year I wanted to buy a new mobile phone. I had two options from Sumsung brand which had been releised recently. For some reasons, I decided to wait for another month before choosing between them. After about two weeks, I found a new Xiaomi mobile phone that was much better than Sumsung alternatives relative to its price.
In summary, I am of the opinion that it is more logical to wait for a few months before buy a freshly-released technological product. You can gather information about other user's experiences in case of those products released for a while. Also, it is likely that after a few months, a more qualified device become available by rival brands.
- Migrating to a new city or country is indeed a tricky thing to do Personally I believe that migration is beneficial for individuals I thinks this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay 70
- Migrating to a new city or country is indeed a tricky thing to do Personally I believe that migration is beneficial for individuals I thinks this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay 71
- Monetary rewards are among the most impressive ways to encourage children to achieve high grades Personally I believe that offering financial incentives for children when they obtain a good grade is a good idea I feel this way for two main reasons which I 71
- There is usually a long que of people waiting to buy a technological product instantly before a product gets released Personally I believe that it is better to wait a while after a prodcut is released and then decide to wether buy it or not I think this w 70
- The reading and the lecture are both about TLP brief flashes of light emited from moon s surfuce The author of the reading believes that there are three possible explanation for this phenomena The claims made by the author are challenged by the lecturer H 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are no users'?
Suggestion: There are no users
...her individuals experience if you wait. There is no users comment at first When a technological p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 797, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...d, however, found his notebook broken 2 month after he bought it. It had crashed, bec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for instance, in summary, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92476489028 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89111501066 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557993730408 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.991465182 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6842105263 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261665901669 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772568444863 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063248739882 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194898034727 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342767272716 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.